🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, threatening messages recurred. Initially, reportedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a retired army general, subsequently from law enforcement directly. In the end, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh asserts he was ordered to law enforcement headquarters and instructed bluntly: remain silent or face serious consequences.

This third-generation resident is one of many opposing a high-value initiative where this historic settlement – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – will be razed and transformed by a multinational conglomerate.

"The culture of Dharavi is unparalleled in the world," explains the protester. "But they want to dismantle our community and stop us speaking out."

Contrasting Realities

The dank gullies of this community sit in stark contrast to the high-rise structures and luxury apartments that dominate the neighborhood. Dwellings are assembled randomly and typically missing basic amenities, small-scale operations emit toxic smoke and the environment is saturated with the overpowering odor of open sewers.

To some, the vision of Dharavi transformed into a developed area of premium apartments, well-maintained green spaces, contemporary malls and residences with multiple bathrooms is a hopeful vision achieved.

"There's no adequate medical facilities, roads or drainage and we have no places for kids to enjoy," says a chai seller, in his fifties, who moved from southern India in the early eighties. "The single option is to clear the area and build us new homes."

Community Resistance

But others, such as this protester, are opposing the plan.

Everyone acknowledges that this community, consistently overlooked as informal housing, is urgently needing financial support and improvement. However they fear that this initiative – without resident participation – might turn premium city property into a playground for the rich, evicting the marginalized, working-class residents who have lived there since the late 1800s.

This involved these shunned, relocated individuals who built up the vacant wetlands into a widely studied marvel of local enterprise and economic productivity, whose production is estimated at between $1m and two million dollars annually, making it one of the world's largest unofficial markets.

Displacement Concerns

Out of about 1 million people living in the dense 220-hectare neighborhood, less than 50% will be qualified for alternative accommodation in the redevelopment, which is expected to take a significant period to finish. The remainder will be transferred to undeveloped zones and saline fields on the far outskirts of Mumbai, risking break up a long-established social network. A portion will be denied homes at all.

Those allowed to stay in the area will be given units in multi-story structures, a major break from the natural, collective approach of living and working that has maintained this area for generations.

Businesses from garment work to clay work and material recovery are expected to decrease in quantity and be transferred to a specific "industrial sector" distant from people's residences.

Existential Threat

For those such as this protester, a workshop owner and long-time resident to live in the slum, the plan presents a survival challenge. His rickety, multi-level operation creates garments – tailored coats, premium outerwear, studded bomber jackets – distributed in high-end shops in the city's affluent areas and internationally.

His family resides in the spaces downstairs and employees and garment workers – migrants from other states – reside on-site, enabling him to manage costs. Outside Dharavi's enclave, housing costs are typically 10 times costlier for minimal space.

Pressure and Coercion

In the official facilities nearby, a visual representation of the Dharavi project depicts an alternative outlook. Well-groomed people gather on bicycles and e-vehicles, acquiring international baguettes and breakfast items and socializing on an outdoor area adjacent to a restaurant and dessert parlor. This represents a complete departure from the inexpensive idli sambar first meal and budget beverage that supports the neighborhood.

"This is not development for our community," says Shaikh. "It represents an enormous real estate deal that will render it impossible for our community to continue."

Additionally, there exists distrust of the development company. Managed by a prominent businessman – a leading figure and a supporter of the government head – the corporation has faced accusations of crony capitalism and ethical concerns, which it disputes.

Although the state government labels it a collaborative effort, the business group contributed $950m for its controlling interest. A lawsuit stating that the project was unfairly awarded to the business group is being considered in the top court.

Ongoing Pressure

After they started to actively protest the development, protesters and community members assert they have been experienced a long-running campaign of pressure and threats – comprising communications, explicit warnings and suggestions that speaking against the initiative was comparable with speaking against the country – by people they claim work for the developer.

Among those accused of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c