🔗 Share this article

In a unsigned ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to employ a newly configured congressional district plan that is projected to include up to five new Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, approves a request by the state to lift a district court's block that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Reasoning

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing significant confusion and disturbing the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its decision.

The federal court had determined that Texas had probably classified voters according to their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had instructed the state to use the maps established after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Sharp Opposition

In a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the majority's decision. She stated that it disregarded the work of the district court, noting that its ruling was written by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

National Redistricting Fight

The court's action is part of a national fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican control. Ordinarily, redistricting happens after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that could add a number of more conservative seats. Democrats, for their part, have responded with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas attorney general praised the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures representation favorable to the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives criticized the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

Another top House leader argued the court had another time eroded its credibility by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.